#best-practices

• Thu, Oct 9, 2025. Core concepts of directing shorts #best-practices #optimization #prompt-engineering
  • Open with a specific curiosity gap in the first 1-2 seconds. Give viewers a concrete unanswered question or visually odd setup ("Why is the coffee floating?") so the brain needs to resolve it. This is supported by short-video best-practice (hook early) and the "information-gap" theory of curiosity. Prompt tip: Start with one line that states the unresolved situation, then specify the exact first frame
  • Use a 3-beat micro-arc (setup > build > payoff) sized for 6-20s. Don't cram a film; deliver one story beat every few seconds. The YouTube/Think with Google ABCD work (Attract, Brand, Connect, Direct) shows simple, purposeful structures outperform meandering ones-especially at bumper-ad lengths. Prompt tip: Add a tiny beat sheet with timestamps: "0-2s setup, 2-6s escalation, 6-8s payoff."
  • Design the last moment first (Peak-End). Viewers remember the high point and the ending more than the duration; plan a twist, reveal, or "aha" and cut right after it. This is the Peak-End rule from psychology; in practice you'll see it as spikes near the end in retention graphs. Prompt tip: Write the final shot first; ensure the last frame resolves the opening question
  • Pace with micro-beats and pattern interrupts. Change something every 1-2s (camera angle, scale, color, motion, prop) to reset attention without chaos. Platform guides stress tight pacing and clear structure for mobile attention windows. Prompt tip: List planned interrupts: "1. whip-pan, 2. hard cut to macro, 3. foreground object crosses lens."
  • Max processing fluency: big, high-contrast, simple frames. The brain rewards "easy to process" visuals (clear figure/ground, symmetry, repetition)-they feel better and read faster on a phone. Keep one subject per shot; use bold contrast; minimal text. Prompt tip: Specify composition ("tight medium on subject, high contrast rim-light, uncluttered background, single color accent")
  • Constrain on purpose: one change, one location, one idea. Constraints raise creativity and clarity. Micro-budget directing advice and 6-second ad research converge: pick one surprising constraint and lean into it. Prompt tip: State the constraint up top ("single hallway; only practical light; one prop changes form")
  • Exploit visual salience and motion immediately. High-salience elements (faces, movement, contrast) pull gaze fast-vital on scroll feeds. Start with motion crossing the frame or a face entering; cut on action. Prompt tip: "Frame opens mid-action; subject crosses left>right; parallax background; quick dolly-in."
  • Make sound part of the story, not wallpaper. Sync cuts to beats, use distinct diegetic sounds (whoosh, click, crunch) as transitions, and specify audio intent in the prompt. Veo's guide explicitly recommends fusing visuals with sound design. Prompt tip: Include an "Audio" block ("quiet street > sudden clack > riser swell; cut on snare")
  • Direct the model like a DP: shot grammar in the prompt. With Sora/Veo you get better control when you name the lens, camera move, lighting, and blocking-and outline complex action step-by-step. Veo shows gains from highly detailed, play-by-play prompts; Sora exposes a storyboard interface for frame-accurate control. Prompt tip: "35mm lens, handheld, subtle breathing; golden-hour backlight; beat-by-beat action list."
  • Iterate on retention, not vibes. Use YouTube's "Key moments for audience retention" to find spikes/dips; move top moments earlier, trim dips, and test a few alt cuts. Shorts auto-loop and rewatch spikes often correlate with a strong twist/payoff. Prompt tip: After v1, generate two alternates: (A) earlier reveal, (B) tighter mid-beat; compare retention

• Mon, Oct 6, 2025. Many people who shifted away from conflict aversion did so by systematizing it. ChatGPT #best-practices
  • Martin Luther King Jr institutionalized not stepping back from conflicts in his movement.
  • Kim Scott (Radical Candor) practiced caring more via short, specific feedback loops.
  • Kwame Christian (Compassionate Curiosity) practiced ask open questions.
  • Ed Catmull (Pixar) instituted Braintrust to ask candid questions.
  • Ray Dalio (Bridgewater) instituted radical transparency.

• Tue, Sep 23, 2025. ⭐ I'm habit engineering, i.e. discovering and stacking habits on to existing ones. For example: #ai-coding #best-practices #future #github #markdown #prompt-engineering
  • ChatGPT suggested increasing observability based on code reviews. I'm including it in my weekly codecast.
  • ChatGPT suggested defining closures inmeetings. I'mn now discussing objectives at meeting starts and effectiveness at the end.

• Tue, Sep 2, 2025. 2 Sep 2025 #best-practices #code-agents #future #prompt-engineering #prediction
  • Bias detection on declined applications tied to regulatory scrutiny (concrete, high-value, demoable on synthetic data).
    • Compute fairness metrics (selection rate, demographic parity diff, equalized odds) by protected_group; show SHAP top features per group; propose three policy levers to reduce disparity.
  • Scenario “adverse action” simulator (loss/collections outcomes vs policy levers).
    • Inputs: threshold, line increase/decrease, collections intensity; Outputs: approval rate, ECL, vintage loss, roll-rate curves; include confidence bands.
  • Self-learning Prompt → SQL log
    • Capture each natural-language question + generated SQL + exec time + rowcount → audit table; proves control & learning loop.

• Sun, Aug 31, 2025. From My experience creating software with LLM coding agents - Part 2 (Tips) #ai-coding #best-practices #code-agents #dev #github #prompt-engineering
  • Use standards. Or, write your standards in README.md and tell AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md to read it.
    • Use a standard file structure. Or in README.md, list what each file is for. Helps agents pick the right file for context.
    • Use a standard build/lint/test setup (e.g. package.json scripts). Or
  • Localize context, i.e. add context in files that use them. E.g. add comments in test files on how to execute them.
  • Keep files modular so agents can read less code and conserver context.
  • Write a developer's guide.
    • Use with /init in Claude Code / Codex / ... or have an LLM generate a developer guide.
    • Edit manually. Agents don't write great specs.
    • Document the design.
    • Write DETAILED specs to reduce deviations.
  • Share goal while specifying tasks. Helps agents fix related stuff.
  • Use deep reasoning mode, e.g. "think harder" or "ultrathink" in Claude Code, or -c model_reasoning_effort=high in Codex.
  • ⭐ Run parallel agents in different windows and share agent feedback with each other. E.g.
    • Server/API coding in one window. Client coding in another.
    • Plan/ask in one window. Execute in another.
  • Add debug logs to help agents spot errors.
    • Start/stop of long/complex operations, state changes, external interfaces.
    • Include full objects in logs. Prioritize diffs. Trim long contents.
    • ⭐ Give access to debugger, e.g. Chrome remote debugging at localhost:9222
  • Agents write poor tests. So:
    • Manually add important ones.
    • ⭐ When you find a bug, ask the agent why the tests missed it and have it add.
    • Review and remove useless ones.
  • Ensure agent passes test cases. Tell them not to disable / skip failed tests.
  • Have agents create a new branch per feature and auto-commit. Merge when successful.
  • Feel free to provide a TODO list or update it on the fly.
  • Interrupt with Esc if the agent's thinking is off-track.
  • When agents struggle, write tools to help them, e.g. JSON splicing, Excel edits, etc.
  • Agents bloat code and features. Explicitly refactor and trim.

• Sat, Aug 30, 2025. ⭐ Habit tooling can expand habit-building capacity. I already use tools to support my habits. Habit stacking "sticks" new habits to old ones. By sticking new habits into existing tools, I can automate this. (For example, I extended my meeting record fish script with an echo reminding me to write the meeting goal, my role, practice kind candor, and measure effectiveness.) #automation #best-practices #future #prompt-engineering

• Tue, Aug 26, 2025. When seeking advice, people sometimes think aloud, become repetitive, and introduce detail before clarifying intent. Kind candor helps. You can: #best-practices #optimization #prompt-engineering
  • State time boundaries. "We have 20 min. If we spend 5 min on your question, we'll have 15 for solutions."
  • Clarify intent upfront. "Before we dive in: What can I help with?"
  • Interrupt, summarize, clarify early. "Cooperative interruptions" are seen as supportive. E.g. "I get this: six accelerators, two done. Great! What can I help with? To accelerate?"

• Mon, Aug 25, 2025. With AI coding, task breakdown, context right-sizing, and automated testing are key levers. #ai-coding #automation #best-practices #code-agents #future #optimization #prompt-engineering

• Fri, Aug 22, 2025. ⭐ Creating systems that rapidly improve from feedback is the key to success. Rapidity, quality of improvement, quantity of feedback are all enablers. #best-practices #future #optimization #prompt-engineering

• Wed, Aug 20, 2025. Given the early, experimental days of AI, the better KPIs might be more about experimentation (e.g. number of prototypes) than operational (e.g. cost reduction). Krishnakumar Menon #best-practices #future #optimization #prompt-engineering

• Wed, Aug 20, 2025. The ROI of prompting carefully and using meta-prompts is high. Prompt clarity reduces iterations & dead-ends. The initial time spent (10-15 min) pays off with just a single reduced iteration (time to generate + review). Tanika Gupta #best-practices #optimization #prompt-engineering

• Sat, Aug 16, 2025. ⭐ From Daniel Kahneman, The Knowledge Project Podcast. #best-practices
  • Key lesson. Have lower expectations. Behavior change is hard.
  • Happiness is pleasure in the moment. Satisfaction is the meaningful story of our life. When reflecting, the thinking brain wants satisfaction. When feeling, the feeling brain feels happiness. The 2 brains optimize for different things. The thinking brain packs the calendar with satisfying tasks that the feeling brain hates doing.
  • Happiness & pleasure are both are good for us. We don't know which matters more.
  • Behavior change is harder than most people think. Usually, it's better not to expect success. Changing others, or ourselves.
    • Instead, understand the cause of that behavior. Behaviour is an equilibrium of forces.
    • Weakening forces preventing right behaviour is easier than strengthening forward forces. It lowers tension. That's inversion!
    • Behaviours are more about situations than personality. We assume otherwise - that's an attribution error.
    • Environment shapes thinking but it's not obvious how, e.g. some people work better in noisy cafes. Some colors are more calming.
  • Leadership & delegation
    • Motivation is complex. People can do bad things for good reasons and vice versa.
    • So, delegate decisions to unemotional agents. But agents misjudge perceived value of gain or loss!
    • People prefer over-confident intuitive leaders over slow, deliberate leaders.
    • Protect dissenters and dissent. It's painful and costly, and needs nurturing.
  • Negotiation is about understanding, not convincing.
  • "Feelings get in the way of clear thinking."
    • Example: I vibe-coded the last 2 questions of TDS GA7 on Claude Code. It didn't run. I delayed fixing it for 5 days, afraid it would a major effort. It ended up a 2 min fix. It could have been major, but checking would have helped. Fear prevented that.
    • Intuition, emotion, beliefs hamper clear thinking. Beliefs are often formed based on people we admire or identify, not reason.
  • What enables clear thinking (all are hard):
    • Pragmatism. Don't threaten your identity, the leader, etc. Else none of this works.
    • Rules, systems and processes. Willpower is illusion. Alignment is an illusion. "Whereever there is judgement, there is noise, and more than what people think."
    • Standards. Shared, consistent scales of evaluation. Super-forecasters use probability scales.
    • Deliberation. Slow decision making.
    • Decomposition. Break down the problem, analyze it, THEN form an intuition. Be disciplined in delaying intuition or forming an opinion.
    • Pre-mortems. "Write the history of the disaster this decision led to."
    • Decision journals with post-mortems. Pros, cons and alternatives from failed decisions, e.g. Ray Dalio's principles. Change of mind.
    • Independent data. Use data. Keep evidence gatherers independent of decision makers.
    • Preparation. Have decision makers write down decisions before discussing. Increases diversity.

• Sat, Aug 16, 2025. From the GPT 5 coding cheatsheet: #ai-coding #best-practices #code-agents #optimization #prompt-engineering
  1. Be precise and avoid conflicting information. Use a prompt optimizer to check for inconsistencies.
  2. Use the right reasoning effort. Prefer medium or low reasoning to avoid overthinking simple problems.
  3. Use XML-like syntax to help structure instructions
  4. Avoid overly firm language, e.g. "You MUST be THOROUGH" vs "Thoroughly".
  5. Give room for planning and self-reflection. Explain what to do in steps, asking it to think deeply
  6. Control the eagerness of your coding agent, e.g. do not ask for confirmation, parallelize tool calls, use more tools, etc.

• Sat, Aug 16, 2025. IDEA Live coding asset talks #ai-coding #best-practices #code-agents #dev #future #github #markdown #prompt-engineering
  • Delete-Driven Development. Keep deleting code until it fails, then rebuild minimally.
  • No-Editor Coding. Pure prompting to build, test, and deploy the app.
  • Audience-Sourced Prompt ETF. Collect micro-prompts from audience. Run in parallel. Evaluate against tests. Create index of top prompts. Compare with expert.

• Wed, Aug 13, 2025. Based on what I've seen of AI coding, new developers need to learn these skills. #ai-coding #automation #best-practices #code-agents #dev #prompt-engineering
  • Context engineering
  • Documentation
  • Automated testing
  • Standards
  • Capabilities of platforms
  • Modularity (and DRY vs WET)
  • Code composition
  • Code reviews

• Mon, Aug 11, 2025. Discussion at PyConSG Edu Summit 2025. Padlet #ai-coding #best-practices #code-agents #prompt-engineering
  • Discussion validation
  • Interesting ways students use AI
    • Use AI to refactor/debug whole codebases
    • Get AI to create questions for practice
    • ChatGPT Study mode
    • Students like to upload photos. We can teach them to upload these to ChatGPT and ask questions.
  • What teaching practices / assessment design can help students think for themselves before turning to AI? ChatGPT
    • Interactive orals / micro-vivas (short, process-focused). Strong alignment with “interactive oral assessment” research and guidance in the AI era: improves authenticity, reduces outsourcing/contract cheating, and checks understanding. Make them low-stakes but frequent. How: 5–8 min viva tied to a task; students must explain choices, failures, and next steps.
    • Authentic / project-based assessments students can self-validate (observable outputs). Project-based and “authentic” assessment meta-reviews show consistent positive effects (achievement, thinking skills, motivation), especially in STEM and small teams. Design tasks with local data/constraints so generic LLM answers are only a baseline. How: “Default AI answer” gets a pass; “A-grade” requires empirical validation, custom data, or optimisation trade-offs with metrics.
    • Pair programming + peer critique on whiteboards/pseudocode. Evidence (meta-analyses & CS-ed studies) supports pair programming for learning and retention; code tracing/peer instruction deepen understanding before coding. How: Rotate driver/navigator; force commit-message style rationales; 10-minute “whiteboard dry-run” before touching IDE.
    • Process-over-product with structured reflection. Metacognitive/reflective interventions show medium-to-large effects on achievement; they also build habits that resist blind acceptance of AI outputs. Keep reflections short but structured. How: “What I asked AI; what it missed; how I verified; what I’d change next time.”
    • “No-AI under secure conditions” mixed with AI-permitted coursework. Matches national/institutional guidance for GenAI-aware assessment design. Use secure, time-boxed checks for fundamentals; allow AI elsewhere with audit trails.
    • Primary research (interviews/user studies) before design/coding. Fits the “authentic assessment” literature and reduces LLM substitution. Grade on research protocol + synthesis rigor, not word count.
    • Explicit problem-solving frames (initial/current/goal state). Classic problem-solving scaffolds; improves formulation before querying AI. Pair with short “assumption logs.” (General pedagogy supported; CT depends on domain knowledge -- see caveat below.)
    • Caveat (important): Critical thinking depends on domain knowledge. Don’t expect generic CT drills to transfer without content mastery. Plan tasks so students must recall/apply specific knowledge before or alongside AI.
  • How can we train students to use AI critically instead of accepting the output blindly? ChatGPT
    • Teach “lateral reading” and SIFT for source checking. Stanford’s Civic Online Reasoning work and Caulfield’s SIFT method offer actionable heuristics for verifying claims, URLs, and citations that LLMs surface. Build these into rubrics.
    • Run “AI auditing” labs (hallucination hunts). Students collect/label model mistakes, missing assumptions, and fabricated citations -- an approach aligned with UNESCO’s call for AI literacy and validation.
    • Use online judges with hidden tests + adversarial cases. Autograding literature supports hidden tests for robust generalization; it trains students to verify and not overfit to visible specs -- or to AI’s surface patterns.
    • “Sandwich” workflow: spec → implement 1–2 reps → let AI complete → verify rigorously. Mirrors human-in-the-loop patterns in industry; use checklists for unit/property tests and invariants before accepting AI output.
    • Live-coding with an AI assistant on display (to show failure modes). Demonstrates nondeterminism/limitations in real time; supports critical habits. Pair with a post-mortem template.
    • Prompt red-teaming/jailbreak exercises (safe scope). Students learn that guardrails can be bypassed and why verification matters. Keep it ethical and bounded.
    • Build a knowledge base first. Reinforce that CT sits on content knowledge; teach students to explain why an AI answer is plausible or not, citing domain facts.

• Mon, Aug 11, 2025. Notes from "Scaffolding the Problem-Solving Process for Introductory Computing Students" by Ashish Dandekar, NUS, at PyConSG Edu Summit 2025 #best-practices #optimization
  • Built an intelligent tutoring system
  • Encourage students to create their own pattern banks / cheat sheets. "Find 2 more problems that can be solved in the same way."
  • Focusing on the problem-solving process shrinks the gap. Students above the 50th percentile of pre-assessment did not improve much. The lowest percentile improved the most.
  • "At NUS, I know that even if I give 0.5% weightage for students attending tutorials, everyone will attend it for those 'free marks'."

• Mon, Aug 11, 2025. John Kotter's organizational change model is the accepted practice for top-down change, while ADKAR is for bottom up. It's surprising how obviously effective both are to someone who has effected both kinds of changes, but there is NO WAY I would have appreciated either during my MBA. Wikipedia: Change management #best-practices

• Sun, Aug 10, 2025. Learnings people shared in Ask HN: What trick of the trade took you too long to learn? #best-practices
  • Finance & housing
    • Time is a non-renewable asset.
    • Lifestyle design matters as much as net worth.
    • Future-proof against regret. The present matters, too.
    • Home ownership ties up location choice, capital and has hidden costs.
    • Market timing & geographic arbitrage has an outsized effect.
  • Software
    • Align abstraction to domain. Avoid premature abstraction (Don't Repeat Yourself vs Write Everything Twice) and over-abstraction.
    • Temporary fixes tend to stick. Stop-gap regexes last for years.
    • Consistency is a quality multiplier. Small inconsistencies cause disproportionate harm.
    • git bisect is a regression-finding superpower.
    • It's OK to write tests covering key parts of legacy codebases - 100% coverage isn't critical.
    • Document architectural decisions: why this approach. See Diátaxis.
    • Flow metrics predict delivery better than (arbitrary) estimates.
    • Building features without linking to delivery spesd wastes resources.
  • Life habits & learning
    • You have the right to say "no".
    • Small, consistent actions beat dramatic changes. Persistence beats skill.
    • You're allowed to change your mind.
    • Over-cleverness backfires. Witty code & communication lead to confusion.
    • Context is king. Without background, everything is mis-interpretable.
    • Fun leads to excellence. Excellence leads to fun.
  • The meta-lesson here is how I discovered these:
    • Run topicmodel to identify topics
    • Feed the output CSV to ChatGPT and ask it to share lessons topic-by-by-topic #

• Tue, Aug 5, 2025. ⭐ Slow, effortful practice (spaced recall, interleaving topics, self-testing) builds lasting knowledge but looks inefficient and doesn't help with exams. # #best-practices #future #learning #lesson #beliefs

• Mon, Aug 4, 2025. ⭐ In "kind" environments (stable rules, rapid and accurate feedback), specialize. In "wicked" environments (rules shift, feedback is noisy/late), generalize. ChatGPT #best-practices #chatgpt #code-agents #future #github #markdown #optimization #prompt-engineering

• Tue, Jul 29, 2025. From a post-mortem of 8 tasks Codex completed for me, here's what I need to improve when using LLMs to code. #best-practices #github #llm-ops #markdown #ai-coding
  • Provide a stable, complete spec.
    • Late UI tweaks, new API params, renamed fields, extra packaging rules, “Rename per‑image download”, “standardise baseUrl vs baseURL”, “add GA‑4 exam module”. → churn & rewrites.
    • Ask the user for a final UI/API/mock‑up + edge‑case examples before the first commit.
    • Lock naming conventions, UI layout and feature checklist early; track future changes explicitly
  • Include concrete examples.
    • Lack of sample images, Markdown snippets, question formats caused guesswork.
    • Supply mini‑fixtures: sample prompts, expected outputs, env‑var names, commit‑message template
  • Environment should be reproducible.
    • E.g. vitest not installed, .dev.vars absent, sub‑modules not cloned, network blocks.
    • Ship a one‑step bootstrap script / README with npm install, env‑var templates, and submodule notes
  • Automate tests.
    • First answer compiles but fails prettier/ruff/unit tests; later iterations fix style or red lines.
    • Codex should auto‑run lint && test (plus static‑analysis / self‑critique) before every response
  • Auto-run post-mortems.
    • Codex recommending its own static checks shows value.
    • Automate that as a pre‑commit step.

• Sun, Jul 27, 2025. Common themes in LLM chatbot system prompts (that are useful in other scenarios) are below. ChatGPT 🅐 = Anthropic, etc. #best-practices #code-agents #prompt-engineering
  1. Declare model identity & maker (🅐🅖🆇🅼🅞). "You are Grok 4 built by xAI."
  2. ⭐ List available tools/capabilities & when to use them (🅐🅖🆇🅞). "Use the web tool to access up-to-date information…"
  3. ⭐ Specify exact tool/function-call syntax (🅐🅖🆇🅞). "To use this tool, you must send it a message… to=file_search.<function_name>"
  4. Code execution / interpreter instructions (🅐🅖🆇🅞). "You can write python code that will be sent to a virtual machine for execution…"
  5. ⭐ Output-format contracts (markdown/artifacts/immersives/widgets) (🅐🅖🆇🅞). "Canvas/Immersive Document Structure: … <immersive> id="…" type="text/markdown""
  6. Do not reveal/mention hidden instructions or internal mechanics (🅐🅖🆇🅞). "Do not mention these guidelines and instructions in your responses…"
  7. Search/research heuristics & decision rules (🅐🆇🅞). "<query_complexity_categories> Use the appropriate number of tool calls…"
  8. ⭐ Custom citation requirements/inline citation tags (🅐🆇🅞) "<grok:render type="render_inline_citation">…"
  9. State knowledge cutoff or freshness stance (🅐🆇🅞). "Knowledge cutoff: 2024-06"
  10. Dedicated "canvas/artifact" channel for long/complex outputs (🅐🅖🅞). "Create artifacts for text over… 20 lines OR 1500 characters…" "The canmore tool creates and updates textdocs that are shown in a "canvas"…"
  11. ⭐ Provide few-shot/examples inside the system prompt (🅐🅖🅞). "Examples of different commands available in this tool: search_query: …"
  12. Code/style mandates & constraints (🅐🅖🅞). "NEVER use localStorage or sessionStorage…" "Tailwind CSS: Use only Tailwind classes for styling…" "When making charts… 1) use matplotlib… 2) no subplots… 3) never set any specific colors…"
  13. Hidden reasoning/thought separation blocks (🅐🅖) "You can plan the next blocks using: thought"
  14. Harm / safety or policy-compliance prohibitions (🅐🅞). "Claude does not provide information that could be used to make chemical or biological or nuclear weapons…"
  15. Copyright / quote-length limits (🅐🅞). "You must avoid providing full articles, long verbatim passages…"
  16. Tone mirroring / adapt to user style (🅼🅞). "Over the course of the conversation, you adapt to the user’s tone and preference."
  17. Response-length scaling to task complexity (🅐🅞). "Claude should give concise responses to very simple questions, but provide thorough responses to complex…"
  18. Ask clarifying questions but don’t overload (🅼🅐). "Ask clarifying questions if anything is vague."
  19. Avoid flattery / filler / moralizing language (🅐🅼). "Claude never starts its response by saying a question… was good, great…"
  20. Political neutrality / multi‑viewpoint sourcing (🅐🆇). "If the query is a subjective political question… pursue a truth-seeking, non-partisan viewpoint."
  21. Location-aware behavior instructions (🅐🅞). "User location: NL. For location-dependent queries, use this info naturally…"
  22. Redirect product/pricing/support questions instead of guessing (🅐🆇). "... redirect them to https://x.ai/grok""

• Mon, Jun 30, 2025. ⭐ When bringing in humans-in-the-loop, applications must make it easier to review and to edit the work. #automation #best-practices #document-conversion #future #optimization #prompt-engineering #write

• Wed, Jun 25, 2025. A useful way to have reasoning models do deep-research-like work is to have them "First, create a plan to solve the problem, clearly listing the objective, approach, and output. Then follow the plan." #best-practices #future #prompt-engineering

• Sat, Jun 21, 2025. Metaprompting. Have frontier LLMs revise prompts. They're GOOD! Ref #best-practices #future #llm-ops #markdown #optimization #prompt-engineering
  • Increase clarity, providing step-by-step instructions.
  • Resolve conflicting instructions.
  • Expand instructions to cover all scenarios and edge cases.

• Thu, Jun 19, 2025. For all AI code, review it, learn from it and share learnings. That prevents bugs AND we learn in the process. Ref #ai-coding #best-practices #code-agents #future #github #optimization #learning

• Mon, May 12, 2025. I was asked how to improve speed when building an enterprise ChatGPT clone using an API. Here's what I'd suggest, in order: #best-practices #chatgpt #optimization #prompt-engineering
  • Streaming. High impact, low effort.
  • Caching RAG retrieval as well as generation. High impact, low effort.
  • UI tweaks. Loading / streaming icons and progress hints ()"Retrieving context", "Generating answer", etc.)
  • Parallelize, if possible
  • Use model options where available, e.g. speculative decoding, models with higher speed, models with closer CDN, etc.
  • Shorten prompts
  • Persistent HTTP/2 Keep-Alive. Low impact, low effort (tweak server settings).

• Sat, Mar 15, 2025. Here is a training program on open source corporate policy. #best-practices

• Sat, Mar 15, 2025. Here are time-tested and robust ways to leverage serendipity: ChatGPT #best-practices #prompt-engineering
  1. Place. Be in places with high, diverse, talent density. Bell Labs (1950s), MIT (1970s), Pixar (1990s).
  2. People. Meet diverse, talented people. Da Vinci's Renaissance circles, Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works.
  3. Free time for unstructured work. 3M's 15% rule, Google's 20% time, Edison's Invention Factory.
  4. Curiosity. Learn unrelated fields. Darwin's earthworm research, Ben Franklin's ocean currents work.
  5. Serendipity. Systematically add randomness. Brian Eno's Oblique Strategies, IDEO's Deep Dives.
  6. Reframe failure as opportunities. Penicillin, Velcro, Post-it Notes.
  7. Ceremonies. Hackathons, lightning talks, coffee trials.

• Tue, Feb 18, 2025. I subscribed to ChatGPT Pro mainly for DeepResearch. Here are the first 50 reports I generated: #best-practices #code-agents #todo
  1. uv Package Manager Overview
  2. DuckDB Analytics Comparison
  3. Rust vs Python / JavaScript
  4. Modern Data Engineering Course
  5. LLM Code Migration Practices
  6. Cloud Cost Optimization Strategies
  7. LLM Coding Interview Tools Report (compare with Perplexity)
  8. Text To Speech Engines
  9. Customer Service in Indian Public Sector Banks
  10. LLMs in Software Development
      • Old version 1: Gen AI in Software Development
      • Old version 2: Gen AI in Software Development
  11. Leadership Training Content
  12. Open-Source HTTP Servers. Caddy wins.
  13. Deep Research Use Cases
  14. Nagpur No-Parking Violations
  15. Data Science in Food Services
  16. Deep Research Disruption to Research Firms
  17. LLMs in Design Thinking
  18. EU Taxonomy Report Clarification
  19. Shell Valuation Analysis Inquiry
  20. LLMs in DSLs Research
  21. Public API-Based Data Storage Options. Supabase wins.
  22. Front-End JS Frameworks Analysis
  23. Database Evaluation Guide
  24. CSS Frameworks Evaluation Guide
  25. CI/CD Tooling Ecosystem Report
  26. Color Names Count
  27. S Anand Biography. Meh, I know more about me, and it gets a few things wrong.
  28. Cosmere Secrets Encyclopedia. This is the best. Deep Research is great if it's stuff I actually want to read, rather than just learn about.
  29. DBT course
  30. Future of Coding AI
  31. Claude Artifacts Use Cases. This is the only one that managed to get artifacts links correct. I used this for an article for The Hindu.
  32. MCP Servers and Clients Research. Learnings:
      • Practically any "tool" can be an MCP server: file systems, APIs, codebases, browsers, collaboration platforms, memory, etc.
      • Most platforms have (or are) integrating MCP.
      • Clients: code editors, chat, and automation tools support MCP. GenAIScript is a good starting point.
      • Tester MCP Client is a browser-based test environment.
      • mcp-cli-client is a CLI-based client
      • mcp-chatbot is a chatbot client
  33. Data Moats by Industry
  34. Attorney Profile Research
  35. Social Media Data APIs
  36. Adobe Software Alternatives
  37. LLM Hallucination Visualization Techniques
  38. API vs Self-hosting Cost Analysis: Always use APIs, avoid self-hosting models.
  39. AGI Preparation
      • AGI will emerge step by step. Knowing which step is next will help
      • AI native organisations will emerge in each of these areas. AI design agencies and AI creative Agencies being one example
      • Networking, empathy, leadership have more value now. So will human AI bridging roles (e.g. AI managers, AI consultants, ethics auditors)
      • What's the value of a human when technology can do everything better? How did this play out in drama (decay) or sports (centralization) or music (globalization)?
  40. Modern digital note taking
      • Voice note taking is the game changer
      • Automatically popping of notes based on context such as people places or conversations will be a thing
  41. Local LLM Search Tools
  42. Blog Post to research paper on copying - suggestions
  43. Linux Dev Migration Guide
  44. Raspberry Pi SIM options
  45. Linux Dev migration guide
  46. HTML to JATS conversion
  47. LLM context splitting strategies
  48. Strategy for AI services in Publishing
  49. Gemini multi model editing use cases by industry
  50. Pharma Conference Participation Guide

• Wed, Feb 5, 2025. Lessons from discussions at IIT Madras: #best-practices #lesson
  • Even in recorded video tutorials, asking students a question and pausing to give them time to think can be effective.
  • When you put students in front of real clients, engagement increases dramatically.
  • Most teaching assistants would like to help diligent students among the bottom half (more than the top decile of students).
  • However, there is a fraction of poor performers who do not care, and are best ignored. Their engagement and effort is a good measure of their interest.
  • Defining a minimal set of principles that we want to teach helps us measure if we've helped the bottom half at least meet those objectives.
  • Teaching is hard. Even after explanations, students, even ENGAGED students, tend to make basic mistakes

• Fri, Jan 17, 2025. Doctors can only do so much. Air quality, where you live, etc can do more for the patient than medicines or the doctor. If doctors keep this in mind, they can be more effective. #best-practices #future #optimization
  • Extending that thought, ANYONE who leverages assets through holistic thinking, becomes FAR more effective.

• Sat, Jan 11, 2025. Measuring developer productivity with the DX Core 4 is a framework for measuring developer productivity. It encapsulates other frameworks like DORA, SPACE, and DevEx. #best-practices #dev #markdown

• Sat, Jan 4, 2025. Some management philosophies used to be successful but are no longer as effective. ChatGPT #best-practices
  • Command-and-control hierarchy
  • Taylorism: deep specialization
  • Seniority-based advancement
  • Annual performance reviews (without continuous feedback)
  • Up-or-Out promotion models
  • Confidential strategic information
  • Narrow job descriptions
  • Relying on formal authority

• Sat, Jan 4, 2025. Some management philosophies have been around for millenia. ChatGPT #best-practices #future
  • Lead by example
  • Fairness and empathy
  • Clear, consistent communication
  • Delegation and empowerment
  • Strategic planning and foresight
  • Consistent rule enforcement
  • Rewarding merit
  • Leadership by virtue and character

• Thu, Dec 12, 2024. I asked the Straive Digitalized Operations team what management techniques they would apply to manage LLMs. Here are the responses: #automation #best-practices #llm-ops #optimization #prompt-engineering #ask
  • Ask better questions. (Prompt engineering.)
  • Create templates or step-by-step instructions. (Chain of Thought.)
  • Ask for multiple options and pick from the best options. (Agentic approach?)
  • Training. (Fine tuning.)
  • Price weaker responses lower. (Stratified model pricing?)

• Wed, Nov 27, 2024. With LLMs, fostering innovation is a new path to profitability. Companies are increasing innovation team sizes. Productionizing that is the next. Some initiatives are: #best-practices #llm-ops #optimization
  • Convert popular demos into starter kits
  • Create and evangelize trainings on solutions and solution techniques
  • Create larger pools of capacity to build innovation and productionize it

• Mon, Nov 4, 2024. Creating a LLM-as-a-Judge That Drives Business Results by Hamel Husain. #best-practices #dev #llm-ops #prompt-engineering
  • Get THE domain expert (or approver) as the tester.
  • Create a dataset that is DIVERSE.
  • Covers EACH combination of:
    • Features
    • Scenarios: e.g. multiple matches, no match, ambiguous request, invalid/incomplete input, unsupported feature, system error
    • Persona: e.g. new user, expert user, non-native speaker, busy professional, technophobe, elderly user
  • Generate data using existing data + synthetic data for each SPECIFIC combination of the above
  • Evaluate based only on PASS/FAIL with a CRITIQUE detailed enough for a new employee. Include:
    • Nuances: Something a failed response did well or a passed response didn't quite do well
    • Improvements: Suggest how model can improve
  • Build an SPA to make it easy for the domain expert to review

• Sun, Oct 6, 2024. Parables on the Power of Planning in AI: Giving models about 30 seconds of thinking time consistently improves results - as much as increasing parameter size by a factor of 1,000 to 100,000! #best-practices #optimization #prompt-engineering #learning
  • This works particularly well for verifiable results (code, math, etc.)
  • Technique: Ask an LLM hundreds of times at low temperature and pick the most common one. (Google's Minerva used this on the MATH dataset.)
  • Better Technique: Ask an LLM hundreds of times. Pick the best solution based on an evaluation metric (reward model)
  • Better Technique: Apply a reward model at EACH step of the process. OpenAI's "Let's Verify Step by Step"

• Sat, Sep 28, 2024. API coding best practices Source via Simon Willison: #best-practices #github #prompt-engineering
  • Always add screenshots to the Readme. They never break.
  • Always add every example. Human think in examples.
  • Avoid defaults and be explicit unless 99% of the usage is with the default.
  • Make the feedback loops incredibly fast.
  • Make deprecations easy for users to deal with.
  • Keep objects immutable.

• Tue, Jun 25, 2024. LLM Patterns include Evals, RAG, Fine-tuning, Caching, Guardrails, Defensive UX, Collect feedback. Notably: #ai-coding #automation #best-practices #future #llm-ops #optimization #prompt-engineering
  • Defensive UX: Microsoft, Google, and Apple have guidelines for Human-AI interactions
  • Collect feedback: Explicit and implicit

• Wed, Apr 17, 2024. Tests and homework have a purpose. It helps people figure out whether they've learnt. So: #best-practices #dev #future #github #write
  • Write tests that make people think! Like DuckDB workshop
  • Share a list of exercises that people can explore

• Fri, Apr 12, 2024. Prashant Pandey: we need to prepare before every meeting. Something to teach #best-practices #future #lesson

• Sun, Mar 31, 2024. How I write podcast. Paul Graham essays #best-practices #write
  • Write simply. It helps communicate. (Don't concise if communication worsens.). It forces you to make the idea better
  • Do lame stuff. Else you won't start. Low standards drive creativity
  • The more to delete, the better your writing. Read your piece. Highlight what feels poor. Fix it. Ask friends to highlight what's BORING? UNCONVINCING? Delete the first, brainstorm the second. Or ask, what's the 10% to cut and 10% to keep.
  • Write about stuff you don't know above the. Writing GENERATES ideas
  • Write about what's BUS. GENERAL and SURPRISING. (Laughter is a sign of comprehension.) Do HARD things to cultivate taste.
  • Spend more time with people who generate ideas in you. Ravi chithappa. Ram. Ankor. Ganes. Books!
  • Build taste. I have a taste for picking technologies. Data visualization. Retrospect. Write down what you like and dislike. Copy what you REALLY like. Guilty pleasures.
  • A benefit of lower standards is that it let's you pick the path less travelled.
  • ITERATE. Discuss ideas. Iterate. Acknowledge. ITERATE.

• Tue, Mar 19, 2024. Ways to use inversion #best-practices #dev #future #prompt-engineering #prediction
  • "Pre-mortem" is an analysis at the beginning of how a project failed. Then avoid that
  • "Red team" or "Black hat" are designated to contradict.

• Wed, Jan 31, 2024. Paul Sloan. Lateral thinking podcasts from multiple sources #best-practices
  • Deliberately engage with topics randomly.
  • Deliberately engage with random people
  • Read a random book from the library
  • Watch a random film in a different language
  • Consciously where the six thinking hats or look hard for the silent voices in your head and express them
  • Ask children. They tend to think of more creative and childlike solutions
  • He converted a hiring process into a contest
  • Constantly ask yourself. What if every assumption I'm making about this is wrong?
  • Scenario planning is really about this. List a few scenarios. They'd have high impact or high probability. What happens in this scenario? Ideate

• Mon, Jan 15, 2024. How I write podcast. Tim Ferriss #best-practices
  • High bars are constraints. I set the strongest constraints against the scarcest resources. Like reputation
  • Being a category of one is more defensible than a competitive advantage
  • Content always beats presentation. When in doubt, push for more interesting content
  • Regular publishing improves thinking
  • To build a habit, do less than you think you can do. That makes it easier to build momentum on the habit and sustain during crunch times
  • There is a lot of mediocrity in the world. If you're doing something (in a winner take all ecosystem), be the best.
  • Top lawyers are exceptional proofreaders. They are able to see what is unclair, and what is redundant, and what has loop holes very quickly.
  • Forcing yourself to cut down from a thousand words to 200 to a paragraph to a sentence takes you through a phase transition where you discover something unexpected
  • The more outrageous the question, the more likely it is to be useful in generating a new perspective

• Mon, Dec 25, 2023. Ways of working with them #best-practices #future
  • Collaborative problem solving
  • Creative collaboration
  • Decision support
  • Personalized education
  • Establishing ethical and safety protocols
  • Recreational and leisure activities

• Sun, Dec 24, 2023. Book to read (again) about how to take a team beyond their abilities even if you're not the expert #best-practices
  • "Measure What Matters" by John Doerr
  • "High Output Management" by Andy Grove
  • "The Checklist Manifesto" by Atul Gawande
  • "The Lean Startup" by Eric Ries
  • "Creativity, Inc" by Ed Catmull
  • "The Hard Thing About Hard Things" by Ben Horowitz
  • "The Four Disciplines of Execution" by Chris McChesney, Sean Covey, and Jim Huling